Cases
OLIVER v. ARAMARK FOOD INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00467
Plaintiff: BRIAN C. OLIVER
Defendant: ARAMARK FOOD INC., ARAMARK SUPERVISOR TASSONE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTANA v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv01226
Plaintiff: NICOLI ANTONIO SANTANA
Defendant: S.O.G. OPERATOR DEW, S.O.G. OPERATOR AMNEYHOWER, JANINE L. QUIGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAYTON v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv01265
Plaintiff: MARSHALL A. DRAYTON, II
Defendant: MAIL BOOKING PROPERTY DPT, JANINE QUIGLEY, DANIEL VAN BILLIARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VICTORY v. BERKS COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv05170
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DROZACK, KEVIN S. BARNHARDT, C.O. REICHART and others
Plaintiff: THERESA VICTORY, AMARA SANDERS and SAMANTHA HUNTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2018cv02758
Defendant: WARDEN QUIGLEY, CAPTAIN CASTRO, SGT TOSSONE and others
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRELL-BEY v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv01484
Petitioner: BROOKS JAMES TERRELL-BEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS, Constance Reese, Rufus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL-BEY v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv00747
Plaintiff: BROOKS JAMES TERRELL-BEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES BOARD OF PRISONS, CONSTANCE REESE, RUFUS WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul-Rahman v. Brooklyn Hospital Center et al
as 1:2010cv01697
Plaintiff: Muhammad Abdul-Rahman
Defendant: Mr. Albertson, Brooklyn Hospital Center, Captain Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?