Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 161
TARAR et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv01984
Defendant: MIKE POMPEO, JOHN DOE, PAUL W. JONES and others
Plaintiff: ZEESHAN ALI ASAD and AMNA TARAR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01891
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
National Council for Adoption v. Michael Pompeo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5158
Defendant / Appellee: Trish Maskew, in her official capacity as Chief of the Adoptions Division, U.S. Department of State, Michael R. Pompeo, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of State, United States Department of State and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: National Council for Adoption
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01263
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01058
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv05067
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00972
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
INAYAT et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv00971
Defendant: MIKE POMPEO, JOHN DOE, PAUL W. JONES and others
Plaintiff: ISMAT ULLAH, INAYAT ULLAH KHAN and FARYAL INAYAT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10810
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
WAQAR et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv00708
Defendant: MIKE POMPEO, PAUL WILLIAMS JONES, CARL C. RISCH and others
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD WAQAR and RISHAM TARIQ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?