Cases 11 - 19 of 19
HUGHES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv01809
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, CARL KUENZLI, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH IND. LLC. et al
as 2:2019cv00082
Defendant:
THOMAS WELLINGTON, WEXFORD HEALTH IND. LLC., RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POINDEXTER v. CUTLIFF et al
as 2:2019cv00080
Defendant:
JAMES FREEMAN, SAMUEL BYRD, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JWAUN L. POINDEXTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARLOW v. TERRE HAUTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2018cv00530
Defendant:
MERIDIAN RADIOLOGY, WEST DENNING, ZACHARY WORLEY and others
Plaintiff:
AARON HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNDERWOOD v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv00425
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., RICHARD BROWN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JESTER v. WEXFORD MED. SERV. et al
as 2:2018cv00131
Defendant:
DR. BRIAN BULLER, DR. SAMUAL BYRD, CORIZON MED. SERV. and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JESTER
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LMIGGIO v. WEXFORD HEALTH et al
as 2:2017cv00571
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, SAMUEL BYRD, MARY CHAVEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MICAH L'MINGGIO
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAXTER v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. BAXTER
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, KIMBERLY HOBSON, CARL KUENZLI and others
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRYE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2017cv00042
Defendant:
DR. MICHAEL ALUKER, Dr. BRYAN BULLER, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KIRK FRYE
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
