Cases 31 - 40 of 54
In Re: Ruiz Hernandez
as 13-8006
Respondent:
CARLOS E. RUIZ HERNANDEZ
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO
Morales-Arcadio et al v. Shannon Jr. et al
as 6:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
Clemente Morales-Arcadio , Jose Rosalino Antonio-Candelaria , Juan Carlos Flores-Medina and others
Defendant:
James G. Shannon, Jr., James G. Shannon, Sr., Cynthia Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Flores-Medina et al v. Shannon Produce Farms, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Flores-Medina , Roque Sanchez-Melchor , Demetrio Santos-Cruz and others
Defendant:
Shannon Produce Farms, Inc. , James G. Shannon, Sr. , James G. Shannon, Jr. and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Clemente Morales-Arcadio
Third_party_defendant:
James G. Shannon, Jr. , Pattie Martinez, Shannon Vineyards, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruiz et al v. Pugh et al
as 4:2012cv01043
Plaintiff:
Carlos Manuel Ruiz, Carlos Garcia, Miguel Feliz and others
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, Correctional Corporation of America and Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2012cv00598
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Ruiz
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Correctional Corporations of America and Michael Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carlos Martinez-Ruiz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-73324
Petitioner:
CARLOS MARTINEZ-RUIZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ruiz-Feliciano v. Commissioner of SS
as 3:2011cv01293
Plaintiff:
Carlos M Ruiz-Feliciano
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
