Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Prasad v. Bolanos
as 4:2020cv08328
Plaintiff:
Kevin Prasad
Defendant:
Sheriff Carlos Bolanos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shikeb Saddozai v. Carlos Bolanos, et al
as 20-16862
Defendant / Appellee:
COPELAND, Deputy Sheriff, CARLOS BOLANOS, Sheriff, County of San Mateo, SHERIFF OF SAN MATEO COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
BOLANOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv93135
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BOLANOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antoon v. Newsom et al
as 3:2020cv03141
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Supervisor David Canepa, City of Pacifica and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Antoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altman et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2020cv02180
Defendant:
Sheriff David Livingston, Sara Cody, Edgardo Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Swann, Firearms Policy Coalition, Roman Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallagher v. Bolanos et al
as 3:2020cv01443
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services and Carlos Bolanos
Plaintiff:
Shane Edward Gallagher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Bolanos et al
as 5:2019cv07215
Defendant:
Officer DeLacerda, Sheriff Carlos Bolanos and Officer McDufee
Plaintiff:
Freeman Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldeon Garrido et al v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2019cv23510
Defendant:
Delta Airlines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bolanos, MARIA BALDEON, Carlos Edgar Bolanos Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Bolanos et al
as 3:2019cv01605
Defendant:
S. Zuno, N. Maier, Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Markiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naranjo et al v. City of Redwood City et al
as 4:2019cv01549
Defendant:
JR Gamez, Joe Farrow, Carlos Bolanos and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Naranjo, D. B., A. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
