Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harris v. Berber
as 4:2023cv03350
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Harris
Defendant:
Carlos Zarate Berber
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Harris v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc
as 4:2022cv02837
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Harris
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Harris v. Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Capt Lewis, Dept of Corrections and Warden Goodwin
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clinton v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2016cv15814
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Harris Clinton
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04274
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Harris
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv00694
Plaintiff:
Ketra Johnson and Carolyn Harris
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company , Covenant Dove, LLC and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Gant v. Harris
as 5:2013cv03271
Plaintiff:
Gail Gant
Defendant:
Carolyn Harris and City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dominican Management LLC et al v. City of Arlington Texas
as 3:2013cv02984
Plaintiff:
Dominican Management LLC , George L Harris and Carolyn Harris
Defendant:
City of Arlington Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In the Matter of the Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on Dr. Zoran Cupic
as 4:2013mc01696
Movant:
ENI US Operating Co., Inc. , Deepwater Specialists, Inc. , Berry Contracting, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Zoran Cupic
Plaintiff:
David Corey
Harris v. Carnival Corporation & plc et al
as 2:2012cv02271
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Harris
Defendant:
Carnival Corp. & plc and Carnival Cruise Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
