Cases 31 - 40 of 44
HUNTER v. DIPRIMIO et al
as 5:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
GARY S. HUNTER
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. DIPRIMIO, JEAN CARTER, BRIAN E. FROSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REESE et al v. POOK & POOK, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv05715
Plaintiff:
CARTER P. REESE and SARAH REESE
Defendant:
POOK & POOK, LLC, RON POOK, DEBRA POOK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nelson v. Walton et al
as 3:2014cv00371
Plaintiff:
Michael B E Nelson
Defendant:
Demarcus Walton and Shawn Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. Pentagon et al
as 3:2013cv04675
Plaintiff:
Cary Ray
Defendant:
Pentagon, Jimmy Carter and Corporations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Dallas TX National Security et al
as 3:2013cv04123
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Dallas TX National Security, COGIC, Daniel Dreysen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvey v. Carter
as 6:2013cv01710
Plaintiff:
Roger Alvey
Defendant:
John Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Steven Shanklin v. Michael Fernald, et al
as 11-50556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DALE SHANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. FERNALD, Special Agent/IRS-CID, JOHNNY M. MCKINNIES, Special Agent/IRS-CID, HELEN CARTER, Special Agent in Charge and others
Arnold v. St. John's Community Services et al
as 1:2010cv01315
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arnold
Defendant:
St. John's Community Services , James Finch and Tennessee Division of Intellectual Disabilities Services
Miscellaneou:
Pam Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CARTER v. BORGOTA HOTEL AND SPA et al
as 1:2010cv05934
Plaintiff:
LAVELLE CARTER
Defendant:
BORGOTA HOTEL AND SPA, MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC., BOYD GAMING GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Macy's Department Store
as 1:2010cv04173
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Carter
Defendant:
Macy's Department Store
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
