Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Koston v. Pauls et al
as 5:2026cv03435
Defendant:
Misti Kroeker, (fnu) Kip, (fnu) Richards and others
Plaintiff:
Noah Koston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06407
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06403
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06398
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06401
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States v. Casey Davis
as 26-3303
Defendant:
Casey Jemar Davis, also known as Casey Jermar Davis, also known as K-Chop, also known as Chop
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States v. Casey Davis
as 26-3305
Defendant:
Casey Jemar Davis, also known as Casey Jermar Davis, also known as K-Chop, also known as Chop
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06385
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Poole et al v. Carlile et al
as 2:2026cv01011
Defendant:
Christopher P Gibbons, Casey Quinton Carlile, David Scott Carlile and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Scott Jackson and William Boyde Poole
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06330
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
