Cases 1 - 10 of 861
Casper v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Justin Casper
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dat Le v. Pham et al
as 5:2024cv01996
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Dat Le
Defendant:
United States of America, Casper Pharma LLC, Casper Pharma Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Craven Casper v. FPC Montgomery Warden, et al
as 24-10948
Petitioner:
CRAVEN CASPER
Respondent:
FPC MONTGOMERY WARDEN and CHIEF UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Marilyn Eason v. Michael Casper, et al
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
MARILYN EASON
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. CASPER and RAYMOND FRANCO
Craven Casper v. USA, et al
as 24-5051
Plaintiff:
Craven Casper
Defendant:
United States of America and Clerk of Court, United States District Court, District of Columbia
Great American Insurance Company v. Discovery Harbour Community Association
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Discovery Harbour Community Association, Evelyn Eklund, Candice Casper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knell v. Casper Air Service LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Bruce Henry Knell, Jr
Defendant:
Casper Air Service LLC, Natrona Avionics LLC and Leroy Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Craven Casper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-10400
Plaintiff:
CRAVEN CASPER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Craven Casper v. USA, et al
as 24-10398
Plaintiff:
CRAVEN CASPER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT WALTERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
