Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Williamson v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williamson, III and Mark Howard
Defendant:
Scott Thompson, Daniel Monti, Cassandra Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Sengupta
as 1:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Shruti Sengupta
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Baker v. Shaw et al
as 3:2018cv00573
Defendant:
Lt. Cassandra Davis, Deputy Warden Chaz White, Warden Unknown Shaw and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Baker
Defendant:
Jacob Sheriff, Ceasar Felton, Chaz White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03979
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Davis
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Braconi v. Navarro et al
as 0:2017cv60834
Plaintiff:
Migdalia Braconi
Defendant:
Tarilika Nunez Navarro, Challae Porter, Derek Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braconi v. Navarro et al
as 5:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Migdalia Braconi
Defendant:
Tarilika Nunez Navarro, Challae Porter, Derek Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Cavalry Portfolio Services
as 1:2015cv07713
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Davis
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Woodham et al v. Digital Risk, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00553
Plaintiff:
Kindra Woodham , Cassandra Davies , Karen King and others
Defendant:
Digital Risk, LLC and Digital Risk Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
