Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutter v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Damien Rutter
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mackey
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Director of Security Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClendon v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Calvin McClendon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Timothy Tibbs, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Steve Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeemer v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard McNeemer
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shields
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caudill v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00745
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Marsha Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Caudill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01792
Plaintiff:
Dianne Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09086
Plaintiff:
Christie Caudill and Henry Caudill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
