Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Grooms v. Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jordan Grooms, Sr.
Defendant:
Casey Cox, Tim Clafflin, John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. McCann
as 1:2019cv01467
Respondent:
No Named Respondents
Petitioner:
Cedric Jordan
Defendant:
Beth Mc Cann
Plaintiff:
Cedric Ross Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SYREK et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05910
Plaintiff:
JOHN SYREK , GREGORY ADAMS , SHIRLEY MCCOY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TARANGO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05822
Plaintiff:
CARLOS TARANGO , GREGORY ADAMS , MARY BARKSDALE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tarango et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03070
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tarango , Gregory Adams , Mary Barksdale and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tarango et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03070
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tarango , Gregory Adams , Mary Barksdale and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Syrek et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as CAC/8:13-cv-00987
Plaintiff:
John Syrek , Gregory Adams , Shirley McCoy and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Jordan v. Fizer et al
as 4:2010cv00099
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jordan
Defendant:
Greg Fizer, D Han, Unknown Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
