Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 183
CASSADY v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00495
Plaintiff: DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY
Defendant: GREGORY DOZIER, CEDRIC TAYLOR, MICHAEL PITTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlo Malone v. Cedric Taylor
as 17-15320
Petitioner - Appellant: MARLO A. MALONE
Respondent - Appellee: CEDRIC TAYLOR, Baldwin State Prison
SMITH v. TAYLOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00466
Plaintiff: H T SMITH
Defendant: CEDRIC TAYLOR, STANLEY WILLIAMS, KEN FARLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Taylor
as 1:2017cv04573
Petitioner: Joe Louis Lockhart, Sr.
Respondent: Cedric Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. FARLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00438
Plaintiff: H T SMITH
Defendant: KEN FARLEY, CEDRIC TAYLOR, TROUTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. TAYLOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00437
Plaintiff: H T SMITH
Defendant: CEDRIC TAYLOR and JAMES MILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Ingram, et al v. Robert Moore, et al
as 2:2017cv02795
Plaintiff: Melvin Ingram , Shantel Adams , David Beck and others
Defendant: Robert Moore , Charlene McGhee , Debra Hammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DEAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00425
Plaintiff: H T SMITH
Defendant: NATHAN DEAL, BRIAN OWENS and CEDRIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMTIH v. TAYLOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00409
Plaintiff: H T SMTIH
Defendant: CEDRIC TAYLOR and KEN PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. TAYLOR
as 1:2017cv02660
Petitioner: MARLO A MALONE
Respondent: Cedric Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?