Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Skeans et al v. Cenlar, FSB
as 3:2026cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damion H. Skeans and Jocelyn Skeans
Defendant:
Cenlar, FSB doing business as Central Loan Administration & Reporting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tovar, et al. v. Cenlar FSB, et al.
as 5:2026cv04546
Plaintiff:
Claudio R. Tovar and Alicia L. Tovar
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB, U.S. Bank National Association and McCarthy & Holthus, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Khurana, et al. v. Clear Recon Corp., et al.
as 26-3509
Plaintiff:
ANITA KHURANA and MAHESH KHURANA
Defendant:
CLEAR RECON CORP., a business entity and CENLAR FSB, a business entity
Michael Zatulovsky et al v. Cenlar FSB et al
as 2:2026cv05528
Plaintiff:
Michael Zatulovsky and Sahar Elyahoodayan
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cenlar FSB v. USA
as 2:2026mc00168
Petitioner:
Cenlar FSB
Unknown:
4607 Garibaldi Ave., Stockton, CA 95215 and Alesca Ojeda De Oregel
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Cenlar FSB v. De Oregel
as 2:2026at00853
Petitioner:
Cenlar FSB
Defendant:
Alesca Ojeda De Oregel
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Robert L. Uriarte et al v. Cenlar FSB
as 2:2026cv05424
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Uriarte and Sahar R. Uriarte
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
