Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Kent Allen, Jr. v. William Wang, et al
as 22-7106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kent Allen, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
William Wang, CEO and Kent Allen
Kent Allen, Jr. v. Andy Jassey, et al
as 22-7090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kent Allen, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Andy Jassey, CEO of Amazon and Kent Allen
Kent Allen, Jr. v. Daniel Ek, et al
as 22-7089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kent Allen, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Ek, CEO of Spotify, Kiari Cephus and Kent Allen
Nehemiah Rolle, Jr. v. AurGroup Financial Credit Union, et al
as 22-3513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEHEMIAH ROLLE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AURGROUP FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION and TIM BOELLNER, AurGroup Financial Credit Union CEO
McBride v. Gibson
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jacque Lee McBride
Defendant:
Lee Gibson CEO doing business as Southside Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Charles Sorenson v. Edward Bastian, et al
as 22-15320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES RANDALL SORENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD H. BASTIAN, CEO for Delta Airlines and DELTA FAMILY CARE RETIREMENT, Trust, Also named as Delta F-Care Retirement
Charles Caston v. Jeff Bezos, et al
as 22-35062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF BEZOS, CEO, Amazon and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Hodge et al v. PNC (Bank) Financial Services Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv02601
Plaintiff:
Harold H. Hodge, Jr. and Chante N. Hodge
Defendant:
PNC (Bank) Financial Services Inc., William S. Demchak (PNC Bank CEO) and Janet "Doe" (PNC's Bank Executive Client Relation Staff)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rolle v. AurGroup Credit Union et al
as 1:2021cv00006
Plaintiff:
Nehemiah Rolle, Jr.
Defendant:
AurGroup Credit Union CEO Tim Boellner and AurGroup Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malik et al v. Redfern et al
as 6:2019cv00455
Defendant:
A Buyer's Choice Home Inspections, LTD, A Buyer, Steven Hope and others
Plaintiff:
Tayyaba Malik and Mohammad Malik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
