Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Charel Winston, et al v. El Dorado County Animal Servic, et al
as 21-15671
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN D'AGOSTINI, EDC Sheriff, EL DORADO COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES, JOE HARN, Controller and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAREL WINSTON and ALMA MARIE TRICHE-WINSTON
SEC v. Thomas Ellis
as 19-2161
3Rd Party Defendant:
GRIFFITH THOMAS ELLIS and ANDREW HUTCHISON
Defendant:
YASUO ODA, NORTH STAR FINANCE LLC, GOODWILL FUNDING INC., Relief Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CHAREL WINSTON, Relief Defendants, THOMAS G. ELLIS and THOMAS H. VETTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00923
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SEC v. Michael Martin
as 17-2184
Defendant:
CHAREL WINSTON, Relief Defendants, THOMAS G. ELLIS, YASUO ODA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL K. MARTIN
3Rd Party Defendant:
ANDREW HUTCHISON and GRIFFITH THOMAS ELLIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. Michael Martin
as 17-2184
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL K. MARTIN
Defendant:
NORTH STAR FINANCE LLC, THOMAS G. ELLIS, YASUO ODA and others
Third Party Defendant:
ANDREW HUTCHISON and GRIFFITH THOMAS ELLIS
SEC v. Michael Martin
as 17-1080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL K. MARTIN
Defendant:
NORTH STAR FINANCE LLC, THOMAS G. ELLIS, YASUO ODA and others
Third Party Defendant:
GRIFFIN THOMAS ELLIS and ANDREW HUTCHISON
Securities and Exchange Commission v. North Star Finance LLC et al
as 8:2015cv01339
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
North Star Finance LLC , Thomas G. Ellis , Yasuo Oda and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
