Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Charles Davis et al v. ABM Industries Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05623
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis, Jonathan Nabago, Mohamed Bholat and others
Defendant:
ABM Industries, Inc., United Service Workers West SEIU Local 1877 and Does I through X inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Charles Davis et al v. ABM Industries Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis, Jonathan Nabago, Mohamed Bholat and others
Petitioner:
ABM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
United Service Workers West SEIU Local 1877 and Does I through X inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Normand v. Boingo Wireless, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03626
Defendant:
Michele V Choka, Terrell Jones, Boingo Wireless, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Bower Law Group Normand and David Normand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Charles Davis v. Hanford Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv01204
Defendant:
Hanford Police Department and D.A.P.O.
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Davis v. Southwest Credit Systems, L.P.
as 5:2017cv01114
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Defendant:
Southwest Credit Systems, L.P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03726
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2008cv04538
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Oakland and Hector Chavez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Santa Clara County et al
as 5:2008cv01512
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, Laurie Smith, Santa Clara Valley Health & Hospital System and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis, et al v. California HHS, et al
as 4:2000cv02532
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis , Jackie Del Rosario , Leeann Bishop and others
Defendant:
California Health and Human Services Agency , Grantland Johnson , California Department of Health Services (DHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
