Cases 1 - 10 of 32
FERGUSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17574
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FERGUSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ferguson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02141
Plaintiff:
Charles Ferguson
Defendant:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02488
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones, Ellen D Dotson, Cheryl B Manning and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ferguson v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Ferguson
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David Byers and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERGUSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHARLES FERGUSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Charles Ferguson v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Charles Ferguson v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Ferguson et al v. Ducey et al
as 2:2021cv00677
Plaintiff:
Charles Ferguson, Dustin Reeder, Adam Darrenkamp and others
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Doug Ducey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ferguson v. Ducey et al
as 2:2021cv00747
Plaintiff:
Charles Ferguson
Defendant:
Doug Ducey and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ferguson v. Vannoy
as 6:2021cv00691
Plaintiff:
Shannon Charles Ferguson
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
