Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hamilton v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith and Daniel Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Hutto et al
as 4:2021cv03104
Plaintiff:
Lee Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Tracy Hutto, Field Officer Caleb Brumley and J. Back
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv03274
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Jeffery Richardson, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Wyatt, Mark Owens, Lee Charles Hamilton and others
Petitioner:
Oliver E. Lister, II, Charles O'Malley, Deshaun R Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodlett v. Delgado et al
as 3:2019cv01922
Defendant:
Paul Rodriguez, Charles Hamilton, Ramiro Delgado and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Goodlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hart v. Hamilton
as 2:2019cv01156
Defendant:
Charles Hamilton, III
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Hamilton v. Christine Brannon
as 17-1410
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTINE BRANNON, Warden
HAMILTON v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2016cv05705
Petitioner:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Brannon
as 1:2016cv01310
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton
Respondent:
Christine Brannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00413
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Hamilton v. Kevin Bird
as 15-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BIRD, unknown employee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
