Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Sharp et al v. Howard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00254
Plaintiff: Calysta Sharp and Caitlyn Howard
Defendant: Chas Howard, Charley Howard and Charles Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Wilkerson
as 2:2016cv01033
Plaintiff: James Charles Howard
Defendant: Candace M. Wilkerson
Counter_claimant: Candace M. Wilkerson
Counter_defendant: James Charles Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frank Amador et al v. City of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05671
Plaintiff: Frank Amador, Jr, Maurice Brunel, Wallace Carr and others
Defendant: City of Los Angeles and Does
Isaac Kiniti, et al v. Julie Myers, et al
as 08-56677
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANY CASTRO, JOSE MORALES-VARGAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and FRED NGUGI
Plaintiff - Appellant: ISAAC KIGONDU KINITI, SYLVESTER OWINO and HERNAN ISMAEL DELGADO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: JULIE L. MYERS, Assistant Secretary, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), GARY E. MEAD, Acting Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations, ICE, GARY E. MEAD, Acting Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations, ICE and others
Amicu: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Robinson v. State of Washington
as 3:2008cv05006
Petitioner: Charles Howard Robinson
Respondent: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Howard v. Blacketter
as 3:2007cv00341
Petitioner: Robert Charles Howard
Respondent: Sharon Blacketter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tina R Haro, et al v. Los Angeles City of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2002cv09587
Plaintiff: Tina R Haro, James A Pitillo, John R Boyd and others
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?