Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LEGG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv80209
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEGG
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEGGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65663
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEGGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 20-6454
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, Psy. Dr./MHU Staff, SHANNON COLEMAN, MHU Staff, KEN BOWLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
McFarland v. Wimmer et al
as 2:2015cv12922
Plaintiff:
Robert McFarland
Defendant:
Joe Wimmer, Tim Perkins , David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Lesher et al
as 2:2014cv23764
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wilson
Defendant:
Lyle Lesher, Christopher Hess and Charles Legg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan Burress v. Timothy Perkin
as 14-6542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUNCAN LAMARR BURRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY PERKINS, Correctional Officer II, JOSHUA HYPES, Correctional Officer, JEREMY ARBOGAST, Correctional Officer and others
Harris v. Ballard et al
as 2:2013cv10803
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Harris
Defendant:
David Ballard , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. Perkins et al
as 2:2013cv01970
Plaintiff:
Duncan Lamarr Burress
Defendant:
Timothy Perkins, Joshua Hypes, Jeremy Arbogast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEGG V. MEAD, ET AL.
as 2:2009cv87589
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEGG
Defendant:
A.P. SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEGG v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv90113
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEGG and CHARLES LEGG
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
