Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SEAMONS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13057
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CHARLES SEAMONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10254
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON, SETH LACROIX, IVAN MAY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson, Seth Lacroix, Ivan May and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Seamons v. Herring et al
as 3:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Seamons
Defendant:
John Herring, Ken Beaver, FNU Hattley and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Seamons v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2016cv00649
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Seamons
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, W. David Guice, FNU Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Batman v. NC Department of Public Safety
as 5:1980cv04000
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Seamons
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, W. David Guice, FNU Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Test Case v. FNU Doe, et al
as 3:1975cv00001
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Seamons
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, W. David Guice, FNU Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixby et al v. KBR Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv02768
Plaintiff:
Rocky Bixby , Lawrence Roberta , Scott Ashby and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc. , Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc , KBR Technical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rocky Bixby, et al v. KBR, Inc., et al
as 13-35513
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROCKY BIXBY, LAWRENCE ROBERTA, RONALD BJERKLUND and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KBR, INC. and KELLOGG, BROWN & ROOT SERVICE, INC.
Rocky Bixby, et al v. KBR, Inc., et al
as 13-35518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCKY BIXBY, LAWRENCE ROBERTA, RONALD BJERKLUND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KBR, INC. and KELLOGG, BROWN & ROOT SERVICE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
