Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CHAMBERS et al v. SD HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
CHRIS CHAMBERS , DANIEL WAINWRIGHT , GARY CHAPA and others
Defendant:
SD HOLDINGS, LLC, EVOLUTION ENERGY CHEMICAL COMPANY, EVOLUTION ENERGY INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martinez v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv01547
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
B Jones, John/Jane Doe-8, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Illes, Sr. v. Beard et al
as 1:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Illes, Sr., M.D.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ph.D. , Dorina Varner , Ian Taggart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01027
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JONES , ROBERT HARRIS , KEVIN LEWIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. National Football League
as 1:2011cv24594
Plaintiff:
Marvin Jones, Robert Harris, Kevin Lewis and others
Defendant:
National Football League
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Damont Hagan v. Shirley Smeal, et al
as 11-3936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMONT HAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, DAVID C. NOVITSKY, JOHN PALAKOVICH and others
Ingram v. SCI Camp Hill, et al
as 11-1025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAI DWAYNE INGRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SCI CAMP HILL, SCI GREENE, Z. MOSLAK, S.C.I. Camp Hill, Hearing Examiner and others
Hagan v. Chambers, et al
as 10-4679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMONT HAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS CHAMBERS
Hagan v. Beard et al
as 1:2010cv00883
Plaintiff:
Damont Hagan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Shirley Smeal, James Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Palakovick et al
as 3:2010cv00265
Plaintiff:
Gary Tucker
Defendant:
John Palakovick, Chris Chambers, Klanedist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
