Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Anita Earls v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission
as 23-2229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANITA SUE EARLS
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE HONORABLE CHRIS DILLON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIR OF THE NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE HONORABLE DAWN M. LAYTON, MEMBER OF THE NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY and others
EARLS v. NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE et al
as 1:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
ANITA S. EARLS
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE, THE HONORABLE CHRIS DILLON, THE HONORABLE DAWN M. LAYTON and others
Petitioner:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Erickson et al
as 3:2018cv00511
Defendant:
Patricia M. Erickson, Steven B. Wolfson, Chrostopher Hamner and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Dillon and Christopher Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COVAS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02072
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. LINDSEY, MICHAEL V. LUJAN, ANNETTE MCMILLAN and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Covas et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Lindsey, Michael V. Lujan, Annette McMillan and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
