Cases 21 - 30 of 498
Maggiore v. Christensen
as 3:2023cv01412
Petitioner:
Edward M. Maggiore
Respondent:
Complex Warden D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilton v. Haynes et al
as 3:2023cv05721
Plaintiff:
Reginald Wayne Wilton
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, Sara Kariko, Scott Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maggiore v. Christensen
as 3:2023cv01307
Petitioner:
Edward M. Maggiore
Respondent:
D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruffin v. Christensen
as 4:2023cv01297
Petitioner:
Anthony Ravon Ruffin
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Magluta v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv01261
Petitioner:
Salvador Magluta
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and David Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castleman v. Marler, et al
as 23-7049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK WAYNE CASTLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN MARLER, D.O., AKA John Marlar, DONNA ARNOLD, R.N., REGINA VAN BLARICOM, OSP Correctional Health Service Administrator and others
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
as 23-35453
Petitioner / Appellant:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Scott v. Christensen et al
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant:
Derek Christensen, Galipeau and Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Christensen et al
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant:
Derek Christensen, Galipeau and Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahadi Abu-Al Muhammad v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Ahadi Abu-Al Muhammad and Onofre Serrano
Defendant:
County of Riverside, City of Riverside Police Department, M. Rardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
