Cases 1 - 10 of 106
US v. Sanchez-Colberg
as 24-1392
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN SANCHEZ-COLBERG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sanchez v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05917
Plaintiff:
Christian Sanchez
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. doing business as Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 22-1569
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christian Sanchez
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. Pagan (Christian Sanchez)
as 22-1535
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wilson Pagan, AKA King Gunz, Pedro Herrera, AKA King Aventura, Rogelio Ramos, AKA King Bogelio and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christian Sanchez, AKA King Chi Chi
United States of America v. Pagan
as 22-1527
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Herrera, AKA King Aventura, Rogelio Ramos, AKA King Bogelio, Fernando Merlo, AKA King Dinero and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Wilson Pagan, AKA King Gunz and Christian Sanchez, AKA King Chi Chi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sanchez-Franco v. Chester County Prison
as 1:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Christian Sanchez-Franco
Defendant:
Chester County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 21-1335
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christian Sanchez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00958
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
