Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Christian Nealson v. C. Cole
as 26-6400
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN THOMAS NEALSON
Defendant:
INTEL OFFICER C. COLE and INTEL OFFICER MORRIS
Davenport v. Szopinski et al
as 3:2025cv01912
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Davenport
Defendant:
Megan Szopinski, John Barwick, Karales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Day et al
as 7:2025cv00719
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Lt. Day, Lt. Tucker, Unknown Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Leonard's Express Trucking, Inc. et al
as 5:2025cv00414
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas
Defendant:
Leonard's Express Trucking, Inc., Double J Transport, LLC and Charles Haskell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Nealson v. Intel Officer C. Cole et al
as 7:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Intel Officer Morris and Intel Officer C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04124
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN THOMAS SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nealson v. Maynard et al
as 7:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Mr. Maynard, Mr. Ball, Mr. Cassey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Stone et al
as 7:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Sgt. Stone, C/O Stacey, C/O Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
