Cases
Tamara Taylor, et al v. City and County of Honolulu, et al
as 23-15507
Plaintiff / Appellee: TAMARA TAYLOR, individually and on behalf of her minor child and N. B.
Defendant / Appellant: CHRISTINE NEVES, in an individual capacity, COREY PEREZ, in an individual capacity and WARREN FORD, in an individual capacity
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, TERRI RUNGE, in an individual capacity and others
Taylor et al v. City and County of Honolulu et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff: Tamara Taylor and N. B.
Defendant: City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii State Department of Education, C. Neves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neves v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2012cv00907
Plaintiff: Christine Neves
Defendant: Ameriquest Mortgage Company and Deutsche Bank National Trust Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In Re: Mortgage Foreclosure We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1563
Petitioner: VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC., SAND CANYON CORPORATION, f/k/a Option One Mortgage Corporation, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
: and
Respondent: TERESA TRACY, CARLOS BAPTISTA, LLOYD A. OGILVIE and others
In Re: Mortgage Foreclosure We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1526
Petitioner: VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC., SAND CANYON CORPORATION, f/k/a Option One Mortgage Corporation, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
: and
Respondent: TERESA TRACY, CARLOS BAPTISTA, LLOYD A. OGILVIE and others
Neves v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2011cv00241
Plaintiff: Christine Neves
Defendant: Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Citi Residential Lending, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?