Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Daniel Kloss v. Albion SCI, et al
as 17-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL A. KLOSS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBION SCI, PA D.O.C., SUPERINTENDANT NANCY GIROUX, Superintendent, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, Medical Director and others
JONES v. ZIRKLE et al
as 1:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JONES
Defendant:
CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, GILES and MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMPER v. MAXA et al
as 1:2016cv00230
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS KEMPER
Defendant:
MAXA, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE and WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Kloss v. Albion SCI Pennsylvania Depart, et al
as 16-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL A. KLOSS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBION SCI PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NANCY GIROUX, Superintendent, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
JAMES v. C.C.S. et al
as 1:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
LEEVERNE JAMES
Defendant:
C.C.S., ANDREA NORRIS, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, CHCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLOSS v. SCI ALBION/PA D.O.C. et al
as 1:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A. KLOSS
Defendant:
SCI ALBION/PA D.O.C., NANCY GIROUX, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BODDY v. ZIRKLE et al
as 1:2015cv00204
Plaintiff:
GENE ELLSWORTH BODDY
Defendant:
CHRISTINE ZIRKLE and ROBERT L. MAXA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00160
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, NANCY A. GIRUX, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE and others
Plaintiff:
PETER IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
IRVIN G. MURRAY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, NANCY A. GIROUX, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTH v. GIROUX
as 1:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ORTH
Defendant:
NANCY A. GIROUX, ROBERT L. MAXA, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
