Cases 1 - 10 of 34
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01519
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(SS) Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023at00752
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Christopher Mitchell v. Elizabeth O'Donnell, et al
as 23-2374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Lavelle Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
Elizabeth O'Donnell, Amy Devine and Caleb John Copley
Mitchell v. O'Donnell et al
as 4:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Mitchell and Christopher Lavelle Mitchell
Defendant:
Elizabeth O'Donnell, Amy Devine and Caleb Copley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Christopher Mitchell
as 23-4291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LADARISS MITCHELL
USA v. Christopher Mitchell
as 23-10780
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WAYNE MITCHELL
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36361
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Powell et al
as 6:2021cv00085
Defendant:
Josey Wells Hubbard and Chad Powell
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Paul Mitchell v. Andrew Saul
as 8:2021cv00517
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Christopher Paul Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
