Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bass et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04951
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bass and Dawn Bass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BASS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56954
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BASS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abel et al v. PORCH.COM INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00694
Defendant:
Matthew Erlichman, GOSMITH INC., Darwin Widjaja and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Barker, Mark Anderson, Cyril Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Bass v. Bishop
as 1:2018cv02500
Respondent:
Stanley Bishop
Petitioner:
Christopher Bass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kyle Bass v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-15359
Petitioner - Appellant:
KYLE CHRISTOPHER BASS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Bass-El v. District Attorney
as 1:2016cv00239
Petitioner:
Christopher Bass-El
Respondent:
District Attorney, Mobile County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bass v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv02196
Petitioner:
Kyle Christopher Bass
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barker et al v. Bevis et al
as 6:2015cv02197
Plaintiff:
Cheap Barker and Kyle Christopher Boss
Defendant:
Cheap Bevis and Kyle Christopher Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
