Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Christopher Daniels v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv02992
Defendant: The City Of New York, John/Jane Doe GMDC Warden, John/Jane Doe GMDC Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Ferrovial Agroman US Corp.
as 1:2014cv01126
Defendant: Ferrovial Agroman US Corp.
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McNosky et al v. The State of Texas
as 1:2013cv00631
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniel McNosky and Sven Stricker
Defendant: Texas Governor Rick Perry and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00034
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00035
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gay v. Pickering, et al.
as 3:2009cv01170
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant: Laura Pickering, Vanessa Jackson and Michael C. Layne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keiser v. City and County of Broomfield, Colorado, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00999
Plaintiff: Christopher Daniel Keiser
Defendant: City and County of Broomfield, Colorado, The and Boulder Public Defenders Office, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2002cv05802
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?