Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Hughes et al v. Swift Transportation et al
as 2:2017cv00089
Claimant:
Department of Labor & Industries
Defendant:
FedEx Freight Inc., Fedex Shipping Corporation and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Unknown:
Alfred E. Donohue, Dylan E Jackson and Hanni Pichel
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hughes and Danielle Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hughes et al v. Swift Transportation et al
as 3:2016cv05940
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hughes and Danielle Hughes
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Claimant:
Department of Labor & Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BRADSHAW v. HUGH
as 7:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
SIGFRID N BRADSHAW
Defendant:
T CHRISTOPHER HUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. City Of Elgin et al
as 1:2015cv10248
Plaintiff:
Angel Pastor Doss
Defendant:
City Of Elgin, Chief of Police, Rigano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUGHES v. ZIMMER, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05562
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HUGHES
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER US, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POSTELL v. PRIDGEN et al
as 1:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
CRANDALL O POSTELL
Defendant:
JOHN C PRIDGEN, ROBERT W CHASTEEN, JR, T CHRISTOPHER HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. AbbVie Inc et al
as ILN/1:14-cv-01476
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hughes and Judy Hughes
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Hughes et al v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2014cv01476
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hughes and Judy Hughes
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
