Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Campbell v. Thaler et al
as 6:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Campbell
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Ralph Bales, Chuck Biscoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeJonathan Cox v. Chuck Biscoe, et al
as 11-40763
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEJONATHAN E COX
Respondent - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, SHARON L. CARLILE and JANE DOE
Townsend v. Biscoe et al
as 6:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Townsend
Defendant:
Chuck Biscoe, Mike Owens, S St 'Pe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Anderson v. Chuck Biscoe, et al
as 10-40650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY A. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, KEVIN SANDERS and STEPHEN HURT
Ronnie Barber v. Nathaniel Quarterman, et al
as 10-40495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE WAYNE BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CHUCK BISCOE, Senior Warden, ROBERT HERRERA, Assistant Warden and others
Cox v. Biscoe et al
as 6:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
LeJonathan E Cox
Defendant:
Chuck Biscoe, Sharon L Carlile and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanton v. Biscoe
as 1:2009cv00769
Petitioner:
Elgin Wayne Blanton
Respondent:
Chuck Biscoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barber v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2009cv00238
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Barber
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Chuck Biscoe, Robert Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiseman v. Biscoe et al
as 6:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Rodney D Wiseman
Defendant:
Chuck Biscoe, Robert Herrera, Bryan Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wiley v. Biscoe, et al
as 09-40183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, DOROTHY BURNS, WARNER LUMPKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
