Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Bland v. CHW Group Inc
as 4:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bland
Defendant:
CHW Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hutchison v. CHW Group Inc., et al
as 5:2024cv04876
Defendant:
CHW Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jr. Claude B. Hutchison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dobronski v. CHW Group Inc
as 2:2024cv11649
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
CHW Group Inc Doing business as d/b/a Choice Home Warranty
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Salaiz v. CHW Group Inc.
as 3:2024cv00203
Defendant:
Erik Salaiz and CHW Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SHEGIAN v. CHW GROUP INC.
as 2:2024cv05811
Plaintiff:
DEROUHE SHEGIAN
Defendant:
CHW GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
JOHNSON v. CHW GROUP INC.
as 2:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
SHERI JOHNSON
Defendant:
CHW GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BRADSHAW v. CHW GROUP INC.
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRADSHAW
Defendant:
CHW GROUP INC. a New Jersey registered corporation doing business as CHOICE HOME WARRANTY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
JUBB et al v. CHW GROUP, INC.
as 2:2023cv23383
Plaintiff:
JAMES JUBB, VELMA HOWELL, TADD SNOWBARGER and others
Defendant:
CHW GROUP, INC. doing business as CHOICE HOME WARRANTY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
TRAUBERMAN v. CHW GROUP, INC.
as 2:2023cv22863
Plaintiff:
KYLE TRAUBERMAN
Defendant:
CHW GROUP, INC. doing business as CHOICE HOME WARRANTY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Connor v. CHW Group Inc
as 2:2023cv06127
Plaintiff:
Jay Connor
Defendant:
CHW Group Inc doing business as Choice Home Warranty
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
