Cases 1 - 10 of 29
KNIGHT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv03493
Plaintiff:
NICKHOLAS KNIGHT, SR.
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, DHS, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01562
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
HAYES v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv01147
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY M. HAYES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CONLON v. CIA et al
as 1:2020cv02237
Defendant:
PENTAGON, DOD, U.S. ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN M. CONLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY et al
as 1:2019cv02188
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES CIA INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COORDINATOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
GREENE v. CIA et al
as 1:2019cv01963
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and CIA
Plaintiff:
LAUREN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BURROUGHS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2019cv01700
Defendant:
FBI, U.S. ARMY, CIA and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE MIRANDA BURROUGHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPHARD v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv01810
Defendant:
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., DICK CHENEY, SHERROD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAKEYE v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00705
Plaintiff:
DOTUN FAKEYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, CIA, UNITES STATES POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and CIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
