Cases 1 - 10 of 14,506
Milakovich v. City of Waukesha et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Cher Milakovich
Defendant:
City of Waukesha, Daniel Thompson, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 1:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant:
City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boothe v. City of Northfield, Illinois
as 1:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Scott Boothe
Defendant:
City of Northfield, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kacar v. City of Skokie et al
as 1:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
Faruk Kacar
Defendant:
City of Skokie, City Of Chicago and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC v. CITY OF CARMEL
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF CARMEL
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
DALE et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
KEYON DALE and LAMONTAY AYERS
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClurge v. City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03914
Plaintiff:
Christopher McClurge
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Leonard Logan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Glenn Evans, Alejandro Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
