Cases 1 - 10 of 35
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Heartland Group Ventures, LLC et al
as 2:2022mc00002
Defendant:
Manjit Singh Sahota, The Heartland Group Ventures, LLC, Heartland Productions and Recovery, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Ashdown, Arkansas, City of v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv04113
Defendant:
Hulu, LLLC and Netflix, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ashdown, Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Vertical Bridge Development LLC v. West Memphis City Council et al
as 2:2020cv00248
Defendant:
Tracy Catt, Melanie Hutchison, James Pulliaum and others
Plaintiff:
Vertical Bridge Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francis v. Schibbelhut et al
as 2:2020cv02214
Defendant:
City of Bentonville, City of Van Buren, Jason Beeler and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Bradley Francis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cellco Partnership v. Alma Arkansas, The City of, et al.
as 2:2020cv02050
Defendant:
Alma, Arkansas, The City of and The City of Alma Planning Commission
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership and Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
White v. Buchanan et al
as 2:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Acutraq Background Screening Inc, Forrest City Housing Corporation, Tenant Screening for Landlords and Tenant Searchers and others
Plaintiff:
Verna White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watts et al v. Watts et al
as 2:2019cv02066
Defendant:
Daniel Shue, Sydney Ann Watts, Kristopher Koelemay and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Lopez and Edward Allan Watts
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Duggar v. City of Springdale, Arkansas et al
as 5:2017cv05125
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duggar
Defendant:
City of Springdale, Arkansas, Washington County, Arkansas, The State of Arkansas, Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System v. Charles Murphy Holley, Jr. et al
as 5:2017cv05053
Plaintiff:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Movant:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Respondent:
Charles Murphy Holley, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Michael T Duke
Intervenor:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 5:2017cv05004
Petitioner:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Respondent:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Movant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: MS:1006
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
