Cases 1 - 10 of 1,446
Saladino v. Mad City Home Improvement, LLC
as 0:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Alisha Saladino
Defendant:
Mad City Home Improvement, LLC doing business as Mad City Windows & Baths
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loyd v. Schmitt et al
as 0:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Minnie loyd
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis and Jason Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gozo v. DHS et al
as 0:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Makusha Gozo
Defendant:
DHS, City of Willmar, Kandiyohi County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Twin Cities Counseling LLC v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 0:2024cv01254
Plaintiff:
Twin Cities Counseling LLC
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Beaudry v. Hansen et al
as 0:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Trevor John Beaudry
Defendant:
Caleb Glen Hansen and Becker, City of, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. City of Edina et al
as 0:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Kyle Robert Moore
Defendant:
City of Edina, Jason Behr, Jefferey Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crush City Contruction, LLC v. Englert, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Crush City Contruction, LLC
Defendant:
Englert, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Campbell et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Venedia Larita Campbell and Martin Alan Smith, II
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Kyle Allen Williams, Paul Franz Albers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Brown et al
as 0:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Asanti Jahi Simmons
Defendant:
Alexander Vladimir Brown and City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
