Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC v. Visa Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC
Defendant:
Visa Inc, MasterCard Incorporated, Barclays Bank of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Kaldren LLC v. CitiGroup, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kaldren LLC
Defendant:
CitiGroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
First-Class Monitoring, LLC v. Citigroup Inc.
as 6:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
First-Class Monitoring, LLC
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Polk v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Manfred Polk
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Citigroup, Inc. , Equifax Credit Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Midfirst Bank v. Craige et al
as 2:2016cv03941
Defendant:
Kristian R. Craige, Sr. and Patrice Tardieff Craige
Plaintiff:
Midfirst Bank
Third_party_defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Citibank N.A. and Citigroup Inc
Counter_claimant:
Kristian R. Craige, Sr. and Patrice Tardieff Craige
Counter_defendant:
Midfirst Bank
Third_party_plaintiff:
Kristian R. Craige, Sr. and Patrice Tardieff Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gorman v. Citigroup Inc
as 4:2016cv00153
Plaintiff:
James Gorman
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
McClure v. Citigroup, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Dan McClure
Defendant:
Citigroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DataMotion Texas, LLC v. CitiGroup, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01721
Plaintiff:
DataMotion Texas, LLC
Defendant:
CitiGroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Polk v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
Manfred Polk
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. and Citigroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
