Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01627
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patton v. City of Birmingham Alabama et al
as 2:2026cv01604
Plaintiff: Jaylin Artez Patton
Defendant: City of Birmingham Alabama and Birmingham Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lowe v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2026cv00673
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Lowe
Defendant: City of Montgomery, Alabama, Montgomery City Counsel, Steven L. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James McConico, Jr. v. City of Birmingham, et al
as 26-12261
Plaintiff: JAMES MCCONICO, JR.
Defendant: CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, BANKS, MICHELE AUSTIN MCCONICO and others
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. Liang et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2026cv06292
Plaintiff: City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Defendant: Charles Liang, David Weigand, Sara Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tameka Fitzpatrick v. City of Birmingham
as 26-11902
Plaintiff: TAMEKA FITZPATRICK
Defendant: CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, Planning, Engineering, Permits Department
Type: Labor FMLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-11079
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tartt v. Foster et al
as 2:2026cv00236
Plaintiff: Dwane Tartt
Defendant: Officer Foster and City of Birmingham, Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Nameros Ford v. Mayor, City of Birmingham, et al
as 25-14548
Plaintiff: NAMEROS D. FORD
Defendant: RANDALL WOODFIN, OFFICER JEFFERSON, BIRMINGHAM CITY JAIL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?