Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Beaufort County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Beaufort County, North Carolina, Bertie County, North Carolina, Bladen County, North Carolina and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cromartie v. City of Fayetteville, North Carolina
as 5:2018cv00340
Plaintiff:
Reginald Cromartie
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, JEFFREY BAREFOOT, R. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, R. M. ASHLEY, RON SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. MACKEY et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
K. D. MACKEY, C.C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01064
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., C.C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM TOMIN, JR., K.D. MORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
