Cases 81 - 90 of 362
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv20878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Linda Lacey v. City of Newark, et al
as 19-3140
Defendant:
NEWARK PROSECUTORS OFFICE and CITY OF NEWARK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA LACEY
WALKER v. COUNTY OF ESSEX
as 2:2019cv16853
Plaintiff:
BRAD WALKER and MAKEITHA WALKER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, CITY OF NEWARK, OFFICER CZEZRE ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER et al v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17643
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, Dwayne Mays, Czezre Adams and others
Plaintiff:
BRAD WALKER, Makeitha Walker and BRAD C. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURTIS v. CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2019cv17499
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, JANE DOES (1-10), JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Curtis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BRYANT v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17592
Defendant:
P.O. JOANNA LOPEZ, JOHN DOE POLICE, SGT. RICHARD FLOUNOY, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM L BRYANT and RAHEEM BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17591
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL, SGT. ILIDIO FEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 2:2019cv16992
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF MRS. CARLTON JOSEPH AUSTIN and CARLTON AUSTIN
Defendant:
PFS FINANCIAL 1 LLC, CITY OF NEWARK and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rahmon Richardson v. City of Newark, et al
as 19-2527
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL LAURIE, CITY OF NEWARK and ROWE THOMAS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAHMON RICHARDSON
FIELDTURF ARTIFICIAL TURF MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
as 3:2017md02779
Plaintiff:
BOROUGH OF CARTERET, COUNTY OF HUDSON, RANNEY SCHOOL and others
Defendant:
FIELDTURF USA, INC., FIELDTURF, INC., TARKETT INC. and others
In Re:
FIELDTURF ARTIFICIAL TURF MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
