Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bridget Toole v. City of Norfolk Police Dept.
as 17-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGET AMELIA TOOLE, a/k/a Bridget A. Toole
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Bridget Toole v. City of Norfolk Police Dept
as 16-1881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGET AMELIA TOOLE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Toole v. The City of Norfolk Police Department
as 2:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Bridget Amelia Toole
Defendant:
The City of Norfolk Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wayne Williams v. City of Norfolk Police Dept
as 15-6124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE CYRANO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Police Operation Center, TYLER STEPHEN POOLE, Investigator Vice Squad and GOINS, Officer/Investigator Vice Squad
Williams v. City of Norfolk Police Department et al
as 1:2014cv01329
Plaintiff:
Wayne Cyrano Williams
Defendant:
City of Norfolk Police Department, Tyler Stephen Poole and Goins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merle Rutledge, Jr. v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
as 09-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT and N. E. KARANGELEN, Officer
Erwin Patterson, Jr. v. John C. Lumpkin P.C.
as 08-2268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.
Defendant - None:
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN E. MILLS and others
Erwin Patterson, Jr. v. City of Chesapeake
as 08-1928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, STEPHEN E. MILLS, JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C. and others
Defendant - None:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, TOWNE BANK, CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Erwin Patterson, Jr. v. City of Chesapeake
as 08-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN E. MILLS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
