Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Ford v. Garcia et al
as 3:2026cv01323
Plaintiff:
Amari Ford
Defendant:
Detective Garrett Garcia, Pittsburg Police Department and City of Pittsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wertenbroch v. Hardeman
as 25-40616
Plaintiff:
Patrica Anna Wertenbroch and Kulwant Singh Atwal
Defendant:
Clint Hardeman, City Manager, City of Pittsburg, Texas
Dixon v. Graner et al
as 3:2025cv06116
Plaintiff:
Daymond Maurice Dixon
Defendant:
Gerry Graner, City of Pittsburg, Andrey Lesnyakov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Briggs v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2024cv07438
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg and Pittsburg Police Department
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lynn Briggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. City of Pittsburg
as 3:2024cv07165
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lynn Briggs
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter et al v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2024cv03179
Plaintiff:
Ashton Porter and Gianna Porter
Defendant:
Ernesto Mejia-Orozco, City of Pittsburg, William Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tallie v. Pittsburg Police Department, et al
as 23-3000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH N. TALLIE
Defendant / Appellee:
PITTSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADAN NANCE, LORI BOLTON-FLEMING and others
Tuning v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 3:2021cv05154
Plaintiff:
Sarah Tuning
Defendant:
City of Walnut Creek, City of Martinez, City of Pleasant Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 4:2021cv03820
Plaintiff:
Earl Davis
Defendant:
Dillon Tindall and City of Pittsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E.P. v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2021cv03030
Plaintiff:
E.P. and Chanel Hoskins
Defendant:
Officer Lee Borman, City of Pittsburg, Does 1-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
