Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kruel v. City of Tampa et al
as 8:2026cv02581
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Kruel
Defendant:
City of Tampa, Nicholas Disparti, Robin Sarrasin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hill v. Naphcare, U.S., Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv02516
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Hill
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc, Jim McLane, Bradford T. McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronet v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2026cv02245
Plaintiff:
Jean-Pierre Ronet and Alan Dennis Peterson
Defendant:
State of Florida, City of Tampa, USDC, District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Naphcare Inc et al
as 4:2026cv04184
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D Hill
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc, Jim McLane, Bradford T McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hasani Jackson v. City of Tampa, et al
as 26-12516
Plaintiff:
HASANI JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF TAMPA and AMERICAN TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-12467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
City of Tampa v. REV Group LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01120
Plaintiff:
City of Tampa
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Tien v. State of Florida Agencies et al
as 8:2026cv01810
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tien
Defendant:
State of Florida Agencies, Warden, Falkenburg Road Jail, Hillsborough County Court 13th Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furman v. Girouard et al
as 8:2026cv01789
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FURMAN
Defendant:
ANTHONY GIROUARD, MICHAEL SCAGLIONE and City of Tampa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elmore v. City of Tampa, Florida
as 8:2026cv01621
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Elmore
Defendant:
City of Tampa, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
