Cases 31 - 40 of 100
LABOY v. U.S. ARMY RECRUITING OFFICE, ARMY CAREER CENTER et al
as 2:2017cv06072
Plaintiff:
MIRALBA LABOY
Defendant:
CITY OF UNION CITY, JDU & 4800 UC, LLC, U.S. ARMY RECRUITING OFFICE, ARMY CAREER CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SUAREZ v. CITY OF UNION CITY et al
as 2:2017cv03203
Defendant:
UNION CITY POST OFFICE , CITY OF UNION CITY, COUNTY OF HUDSON and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOTA J SUAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
The Estate of Vasilios Katsouras et al v. City of Union City et al
as 3:2017cv01075
Defendant:
City of Union City and Union City Police Department
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Vasilios Katsouras , Klearchos Katsouras and Nancy Katsouras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn E Crawford v. City of Union City et al
as 3:2016cv03094
Plaintiff:
Vaughn E Crawford
Defendant:
City of Union City , Union City Police Department , Darryl C McAllister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Natasha Williams v. Ronald Brown
as 16-12389
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
NATASHA WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
RONALD BROWN, Individually
:
CITY OF UNION CITY, GEORGIA
ECONOPOULY et al v. THE CITY OF UNION CITY et al
as 2:2016cv02564
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIOUS ECONOPOULY and HUDSON FOOT HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
THE CITY OF UNION CITY and THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF UNION CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
VINCENT v. AGUIAR et al
as 2:2015cv05505
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL VINCENT
Defendant:
RANDOLFO AGUIAR , R. FERNANDEZ , POLICE OFFICER SGT. ZEITOUNIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-12038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
