Cases 1 - 10 of 82
In re: Davis, et al
as 26-3089
Petitioner:
MARVIN B. DAVIS, JR. and APRIL GAIL ALLEN
Respondent:
CITY OF WICHITA COUNCIL and SEDGWICK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2025cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Teetz v. Stepien, et al
as 24-3153
Defendant:
AMANDA DARROW, JASON STEPIEN, RYAN O'HARE and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUAN TEETZ, as next friend and personal representative of the Estate of Cedric Lofton, deceased
Davis, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLA DAVIS and JALEN DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, in his official and individual capacities, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Jordan v. City of Wichita, Kansas, et al
as 23-3173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS and DARRELL KOHLS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Wichita County et al
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Dewayne Smith
Defendant:
Wichita County and City of Wichita Falls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3284
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Haulmark v. City of Wichita, et al
as 22-3243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS HAULMARK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WICHITA and BRANDON WHIPPLE, in his official capacity as the Mayor of the City of Wichita
Washington v. City of Wichita, et al
as 22-3176
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN J. WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF WICHITA and DRAKE KREIFELS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
