Cases 41 - 50 of 418
Quintez Talley v. Bissell, et alIn re: Quintez Talley v. Bissell, et al
as 23-1264
Petitioner:
In re: QUINTEZ TALLEY
Respondent:
SGT. BISSELL, C/O BARRETTO, C/O MARTIN and others
Dejon Clark v. Howard Harcha, III, et al
as 23-1226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPH CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTHONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
Anthony Caiby v. Jaime Sorber, et al
as 23-1107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY V. CAIBY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT JAIME SORBER, CORRECTION OFFICER LISA CLARK, Major of Unit Managment and AMEDENT OLIVERI, Unit Manager SCI-Phoenix
USA v. Michael Clark
as 23-1109
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL CLARK, a/k/a TANK
Shelby Clark, Jr. v. Clinton Wambold
as 22-2935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHELBY TYRONE CLARK, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CLINTON WAMBOLD
Albert Korb v. Sgt. Haystings, et al
as 22-2832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT B. KORB
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. HAYSTINGS, JOHN E. WETZEL, SRC DOC and MIKE CLARK, Superintendent Albion
Susan Rogers v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 22-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN M. ROGERS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III, DECEASED, AND WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
AO SMITH CORP, A W CHESTERTON INC, ALLEN BRADLEY CO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, BEAZER EAST INC, formerly known as KOPPERS, BROUDY SUPPLY and others
Quintez Talley v. Bissell, et al
as 22-2546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. BISSELL, C/O BARRETTO, C/O MARTIN and others
John Butler v. Howard Sissem, et al
as 22-2349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD SISSEM, SGT DELANEY, sued in their individual capacities, JERI SMOCK and others
James ClarkIn re: James Clark
as 22-2325
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EDWARD CLARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
