Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,055
David Martincic, et al v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 20-3068
Defendant / Appellee: AURORA PUMPS, SAUER INC, SWINDELL-DRESSLER INTERNATIONAL CO and others
Defendant: BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES INC, SULZER PUMPS SOLUTIONS INC, FKA Ahlstrom Pumps LLC, EICHLEAY CORP and others
Defendant / Appellant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: MERL WILLIAMS, His Husband and DAVID P. MARTINCIC
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant: CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
Osterhout et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00208
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Robert Osterhout and Pearl Osterhout
Cross Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, General Electric Company, Imo Industries Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Homelite Consumer Products, Inc. and Warren Pumps LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant: ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant: BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant: PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
COOK v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77382
Plaintiff: B.W. COOK and B.W. COOK
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
MCTIER v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77432
Plaintiff: ROBERT A. MCTIER and ROBERT A. MCTIER
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BRYANT v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77487
Plaintiff: ALENE M. BRYANT and ALENE M. BRYANT
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
HARPER v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77543
Plaintiff: JAMES T. HARPER and JAMES T. HARPER
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
DEBLIEUZ v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77994
Plaintiff: JAMES C. DEBLIEUZ and JAMES C. DEBLIEUZ
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?